Public perceptions of autonomous lethal weapons systems

Abstract This study attempts to bridge the gap in empirical and philosophical research on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), through a survey of attitudes using experimental methods. “LAWS” refer “fully weapons” that can set attack targets without human involvement are lethal. Based previous research, we conducted randomized controlled experiment create, present, collect responses scenarios describing military operations outcomes likely express awareness ethical issues raised by LAWS. First, our hypothesis LAWS less be used was rejected, opposite trend observed. Second, civilian casualties rather than combatant would influence use strongly significantly confirmed. Third, remote more rejected. Fourth, there some support for homeland defense. Fifth, male younger individuals willing confirmed male, but not basis age. highlights need further discussion based these findings.